{"id":33675,"date":"2020-03-05T20:58:12","date_gmt":"2020-03-05T20:58:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/"},"modified":"2020-03-05T20:58:12","modified_gmt":"2020-03-05T20:58:12","slug":"lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/","title":{"rendered":"Let&#8217;s Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let&#8217;s take time out"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s Encrypt has halted its plans to cancel all three million flawed web security certificates \u2013 after fearing the super-revocation may effectively break a chunk of the internet for netizens.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this week, the non-profit certificate authority, which issues HTTPS certs for free, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theregister.co.uk\/2020\/03\/03\/lets_encrypt_cert_revocation\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">announced a plan<\/a> to disable some three million certificates tainted by a software bug.<\/p>\n<p>The <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/bugzilla.mozilla.org\/show_bug.cgi?id=1619047\">programming blunder<\/a>, in Let&#8217;s Encrypt&#8217;s automated certificate management software, affects users who create a certificate for a domain and then, some days later, create more related certificates \u2013 the code bungled the rechecking process that needed to take place.<\/p>\n<p>Website owners were told to fix their certs as soon as possible because mass revocation would begin on March 4, at 16:00 PT (00:00 UTC). Failure to take action meant visitors to unamended websites would see warnings of insecure connections in their browsers. The culling process actually began March 4, 00:00 PT (20:00 UTC).<\/p>\n<p>The short timeline is a consequence of the Baseline Requirements that Certificate Authorities agree to follow. Even so, Let&#8217;s Encrypt only managed to make it halfway through the process before calling time.<\/p>\n<p>In a <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/community.letsencrypt.org\/t\/2020-02-29-caa-rechecking-bug\/114591\/2\">forum post<\/a> on Wednesday, Josh Aras, executive director of Let&#8217;s Encrypt, announced a delay to avoid undue damage to the internet.<\/p>\n<div class=\"promo_article\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/regmedia.co.uk\/2020\/03\/03\/shutterstock_https.jpg?x=174&amp;y=115&amp;crop=1\" width=\"174\" height=\"115\" alt=\"A close-up of a HTTPS web address in a browser\"><\/p>\n<h2 title=\"Tons of TLS certs need to be tossed immediately after Go snafu\">Let&#8217;s Encrypt? Let&#8217;s revoke 3 million HTTPS certificates on Wednesday, more like: Check code loop blunder strikes<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theregister.co.uk\/2020\/03\/03\/lets_encrypt_cert_revocation\/\"><span>READ MORE<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, we believe it\u2019s likely that more than one million certificates will not be replaced before the compliance deadline for revocation is upon us at March 5 19:00 PT (03:00 UTC, 21:00 US EST),&#8221; wrote Aras. &#8220;Rather than potentially break so many sites and cause concern for their visitors, we have determined that it is in the best interest of the health of the Internet for us to not revoke those certificates by the deadline.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>By the compliance deadline this evening, Aras said 1,706,505 certificates that have been replaced would have been revoked. And 445 certificates that forbid issuance by Let&#8217;s Encrypt were treated as high-priority targets for revocation.<\/p>\n<p>As for the remaining 1.3 million or so, some of these will be revoked when Let&#8217;s Encrypt is certain that doing so will not cause undue disruption. Other bad certs left untreated should die of old age. Aras said that since Let&#8217;s Encrypt certificates only have 90 day lifetimes (they designed for auto-renewal), unfixed certs will expire on their own if not dealt with.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Register<\/em> asked Let&#8217;s Encrypt whether the owners of the spared certs have been told they have extra time. Evidently, they haven&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The original set of affected subscribers for whom we have email addresses were sent an email letting them know of the error with their certificates,&#8221; a spokesperson said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That email guided them to <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" href=\"https:\/\/community.letsencrypt.org\/\">our forum<\/a> to get help and the most updated information. The forum is the best place to interact with Let&#8217;s Encrypt, so we aim to drive people there as much as possible.&#8221; \u00ae<\/p>\n<p class=\"wptl btm\"><span>Sponsored:<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/go.theregister.co.uk\/tl\/1901\/-8266\/quit-your-addiction-to-storage?td=wptl1901\">Quit your addiction to storage<\/a><\/p>\n<p>READ MORE <a href=\"https:\/\/go.theregister.co.uk\/feed\/www.theregister.co.uk\/2020\/03\/05\/lets_encrypt_halts\/\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Online security initiative halts hurried purge to accommodate reality Let&#8217;s Encrypt has halted its plans to cancel all three million flawed web security certificates \u2013 after fearing the super-revocation may effectively break a chunk of the internet for netizens.\u2026 READ MORE HERE&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":33676,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_layout":"default_layout","footnotes":""},"categories":[63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-register"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Let&#039;s Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let&#039;s take time out 2026 | ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News | ThreatsHub.org | Cloud Security &amp; Cyber Threats Analysis Hub. 100% Free OSINT Threat Intelligent and Cybersecurity News.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Let&#039;s Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let&#039;s take time out 2026 | ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News | ThreatsHub.org | Cloud Security &amp; Cyber Threats Analysis Hub. 100% Free OSINT Threat Intelligent and Cybersecurity News.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-03-05T20:58:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/coredata\/uploads\/2020\/03\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"174\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"115\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"TH Author\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@threatshub\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@threatshub\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"TH Author\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"TH Author\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12e0a8671ff89a863584f193e7062476\"},\"headline\":\"Let&#8217;s Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let&#8217;s take time out\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-05T20:58:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":512,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"The Register\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/\",\"name\":\"Let's Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let's take time out 2026 | ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-03-05T20:58:12+00:00\",\"description\":\"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News | ThreatsHub.org | Cloud Security & Cyber Threats Analysis Hub. 100% Free OSINT Threat Intelligent and Cybersecurity News.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/03\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg\",\"width\":174,\"height\":115},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Let&#8217;s Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let&#8217;s take time out\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News\",\"description\":\"%%focuskw%% Threat Intel \u2013 Threat Intel Services \u2013 CyberIntelligence \u2013 Cyber Threat Intelligence - Threat Intelligence Feeds - Threat Intelligence Reports - CyberSecurity Report \u2013 Cyber Security PDF \u2013 Cybersecurity Trends - Cloud Sandbox \u2013- Threat IntelligencePortal \u2013 Incident Response \u2013 Threat Hunting \u2013 IOC - Yara - Security Operations Center \u2013 SecurityOperation Center \u2013 Security SOC \u2013 SOC Services - Advanced Threat - Threat Detection - TargetedAttack \u2013 APT \u2013 Anti-APT \u2013 Advanced Protection \u2013 Cyber Security Services \u2013 Cybersecurity Services -Threat Intelligence Platform\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Threatshub.org\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"ThreatsHub.org\",\"alternateName\":\"Threatshub.org\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Threatshub_Favicon1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/05\\\/Threatshub_Favicon1.jpg\",\"width\":432,\"height\":435,\"caption\":\"ThreatsHub.org\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/threatshub\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.threatshub.org\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12e0a8671ff89a863584f193e7062476\",\"name\":\"TH Author\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/066276f086d5155df79c850206a779ad368418a844da0182ce43f9cd5b506c3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/066276f086d5155df79c850206a779ad368418a844da0182ce43f9cd5b506c3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/066276f086d5155df79c850206a779ad368418a844da0182ce43f9cd5b506c3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"TH Author\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Let's Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let's take time out 2026 | ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News","description":"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News | ThreatsHub.org | Cloud Security & Cyber Threats Analysis Hub. 100% Free OSINT Threat Intelligent and Cybersecurity News.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Let's Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let's take time out 2026 | ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News","og_description":"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News | ThreatsHub.org | Cloud Security & Cyber Threats Analysis Hub. 100% Free OSINT Threat Intelligent and Cybersecurity News.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/","og_site_name":"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News","article_published_time":"2020-03-05T20:58:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":174,"height":115,"url":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/coredata\/uploads\/2020\/03\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"TH Author","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@threatshub","twitter_site":"@threatshub","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"TH Author","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/"},"author":{"name":"TH Author","@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12e0a8671ff89a863584f193e7062476"},"headline":"Let&#8217;s Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let&#8217;s take time out","datePublished":"2020-03-05T20:58:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/"},"wordCount":512,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/coredata\/uploads\/2020\/03\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg","articleSection":["The Register"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/","url":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/","name":"Let's Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let's take time out 2026 | ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/coredata\/uploads\/2020\/03\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg","datePublished":"2020-03-05T20:58:12+00:00","description":"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News | ThreatsHub.org | Cloud Security & Cyber Threats Analysis Hub. 100% Free OSINT Threat Intelligent and Cybersecurity News.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/coredata\/uploads\/2020\/03\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/coredata\/uploads\/2020\/03\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out.jpg","width":174,"height":115},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/lets-encrypt-ok-maybe-nuking-three-million-https-certs-at-once-was-a-tad-ambitious-lets-take-time-out\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Let&#8217;s Encrypt: OK, maybe nuking three million HTTPS certs at once was a tad ambitious. Let&#8217;s take time out"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/","name":"ThreatsHub Cybersecurity News","description":"%%focuskw%% Threat Intel \u2013 Threat Intel Services \u2013 CyberIntelligence \u2013 Cyber Threat Intelligence - Threat Intelligence Feeds - Threat Intelligence Reports - CyberSecurity Report \u2013 Cyber Security PDF \u2013 Cybersecurity Trends - Cloud Sandbox \u2013- Threat IntelligencePortal \u2013 Incident Response \u2013 Threat Hunting \u2013 IOC - Yara - Security Operations Center \u2013 SecurityOperation Center \u2013 Security SOC \u2013 SOC Services - Advanced Threat - Threat Detection - TargetedAttack \u2013 APT \u2013 Anti-APT \u2013 Advanced Protection \u2013 Cyber Security Services \u2013 Cybersecurity Services -Threat Intelligence Platform","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Threatshub.org","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/#organization","name":"ThreatsHub.org","alternateName":"Threatshub.org","url":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/coredata\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Threatshub_Favicon1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/coredata\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Threatshub_Favicon1.jpg","width":432,"height":435,"caption":"ThreatsHub.org"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/threatshub"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12e0a8671ff89a863584f193e7062476","name":"TH Author","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/066276f086d5155df79c850206a779ad368418a844da0182ce43f9cd5b506c3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/066276f086d5155df79c850206a779ad368418a844da0182ce43f9cd5b506c3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/066276f086d5155df79c850206a779ad368418a844da0182ce43f9cd5b506c3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"TH Author"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33675\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33676"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.threatshub.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}