![\"London,](\"https:\/\/regmedia.co.uk\/2018\/05\/15\/shutterstock_metropolitan_police.jpg?x=174&y=115&crop=1\")
<\/p>\nZero arrests, 2 correct matches, no criminals: London cops’ facial recog tech slammed<\/h2>\n
READ MORE<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n The Metropolitan Police is in the midst of what it is calling a trial of automated facial recognition (AFR) technology, although it has been using the kit since 2016.<\/p>\n Last week it used the kit in Romford, Essex<\/a>, parking a van outside the station between 10am and 6pm. The cameras scan the faces of passersby and checks them against a watch list that is supposed to be freshly drawn up for each deployment.<\/p>\n Forces have argued the public expects them to use emerging tech to improve policing, but critics railed against the fact it is being tested in live environments without a legal framework and in the face of evidence<\/a> it has a 98 per cent false positive rate.<\/p>\n And it seems unlikely that last week’s deployment has shifted that rate very much, with it leading to just three arrests, of which only one resulted in the person being charged.<\/p>\n That man, Scott Russell, was arrested on suspicion of breach of a molestation order and then charged and sentenced to 11 weeks’ imprisonment.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, the Met said a 15-year-old boy had been arrested on suspicion of robbery, but then “assessed as no longer wanted for the offence and released with no further action”. The Met didn’t comment when asked if this person should have been included on the watch-list in the first place.<\/p>\n A third man, aged 28, was arrested on suspicion of false imprisonment and kidnapping but was also released with no further action.<\/p>\n Despite the fact only one of the three was charged, the Met’s Ivan Balhatchet said in a statement that the “use of the equipment at Romford Town Centre resulted in several arrests for violent offences”.<\/p>\n A press release<\/a> also set out five other arrests that took place during the deployment, but a Met spokesperson confirmed that these were not a direct result of AFR, but “proactive arrests as part of the wider operation”.<\/p>\n Three of these have been released “under investigation”, while the remaining two \u2013 arrested on suspicion of drug possession \u2013 were dealt with via a community resolution.<\/p>\n Perhaps more controversially, the Met also handed a man a \u00a390 penalty during the deployment. Civil rights group Big Brother Watch tweeted from the scene that he had been approached by police after covering his face to avoid being caught on camera, after which he “got annoyed” and was handed the fine.<\/p>\n A man was just stopped by police for pulling his jacket over his face.<\/p>\n He protested that there was no reason to be stopped as he was surrounded by police + when he got annoyed he was fined \u00a390 for a supposed public order offence.<\/p>\n What kind of oppressive police action is this? pic.twitter.com\/qOTISwTcX2<\/a><\/p>\n\n